Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Neogene
Paleogene
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Carboniferous
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Cambrian
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic
Paleoproterozoic


Main source = Abduazimova, Z.M. (Ed.), 2001. Stratigraphic Dictionary of Uzbekistan. IMR (Institute of Mineral Resources), Tashkent, 580 pp. (In Russian) Translated to English by the GeoGPT group, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, China--see About

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Pistalitau Formation

Pistalitau Fm


Period: 
Devonian

Age Interval: 
Givetian, N3, N3a


Province: 
Nuratau

Type Locality and Naming

In the Pistalitau Mountains, N. Nuratau ridge. O.I. Sergun'kova, 1965 (457, p.127-128). Stratotype in the section of the Pistalitau Mountains.

Synonym: Pistalitau Suite, Писталитасуская св.


Lithology and Thickness

Dark and dark-gray thin- and medium-bedded, locally banded, clastic-detrital, nodular, partially aphanitic limestones with rare layers of calcareous sandstones.

According to A., thickness 592m; According to P.N. Podkopaev (1961f.), - 250m, According to the data of N.V. Cherkashenko, Yu.N. Apekina, et al. (1983f.), the thickness of the suite varies from 150 to 250 m.


Lithology Pattern: 
Limestone


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

It lies conformably on the Uchkulach Fm, has facially sliding lateral relationships with the Khanbandytay Fm

Upper contact

It is overlain in the Pistalitau Mountains conformably by the Kolsuyuk Fm, in the Khanbandytay Mountains by the Ment Fm.

Regional extent

Northern Nuratau ridge, Pistalitau Mountains, Khanbandytay. Yu.N. Apekina et al. (1981f.) part of the Pistalitau Fm (the stromatoporoid-amphiporoid horizon, according P.N. Podkopaev) is distinguished as the Jizak Fm, and only the "tabulate horizon" is attributed to the Pistalitau Fm according to P.N. Podkopaev (1961f.). Z.S. Rumyantseva et al. (1982f.) consider the Pistalitau Fm and Khanbandytau Fm are age analogs.


GeoJSON

null

Fossils

Stromatoporoids predominate in the composition of organic remains, hence the deposits were initially called the stromatoporoid formation. Contains stromatoporoids Amphipora ramosa Phill., Actinostroma">Actinostroma clathratum Nich., Stachyodes costulata Lec., S. gracilis var. kuznetskensis Yavor.; tabulates - Thamnopora cervicornis Blain., Scoliopora denticulata M. Edw. et Haime, Alveolitella fecunda Salle, A. polenovi Peetz., Caliapora battersbyi M. Edwards et Haime, Pachycanalicula karcevae Dubat.; rugosans Macgea cf. murchisoni Soshk., Stringophyllum difficile Soshk., Campophyllum litvinovitschae Soshk.; brachiopods - Stringocephalus burtini Defr., Bornhardtina uncitoides Schulz, Uncytes griphus Schloth., Atrypa desquamata Sow. and others; foraminifera - Archaesphaera minima Sul., Radiosphaera panderoza Reitl., Parathurammina subovata N. Byk. and others.


Age 

Givetian epoch (Usmanov et al., 1999f.; 165; 460).

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Givetian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.25

    Beginning date (Ma): 
383.70

    Ending stage: 
Givetian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
1.0

    Ending date (Ma):  
378.90

Depositional setting


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

A.I. Kim – In: GeoGPT translation of: “Abduazimova, Z.M. (Ed.), 2001. Stratigraphic Dictionary of Uzbekistan. IMR (Institute of Mineral Resources), Tashkent, 580 pp. (In Russian)”